Like many thousands of law students all over the country, for the last couple of months, I have been applying for Pupillage.
‘Pupillage’ is a word that is loaded with so many meanings, outcomes and emotions – grueling interviews, offers, rejections, ‘fitting in’, intellectual ability, euphoria and disappointment.
Despite my more advanced years and the non-traditional path that led me to this point (I am in my thirties, working full time, and was always more ‘political’ than ‘legal’), I have thrown myself fully into seeking pupillage in an attempt to try and get through what is the most rigorous and bewildering recruitment process I have ever experienced.
City Law School’s Pupillage Advice Service offer a specialist team to give advice on Pupillage.
The PAS team at The City Law School have dedicated hour upon hour to reviewing CVs to help create tailored application forms, running mock interviews, mock advocacy exercises, organising lectures and Panel events with barristers and a day of lectures and advice on the bewildering process. Their advice on completing the Gateway forms helped and I was delighted when I secured a number of interviews with Chambers. Of course, that’s when the real work starts.
You can guarantee there will be a legal problem to solve but I found myself wondering; what else makes up the pupillage interview we work so hard to get?
First Impressions – The Mock Interview with PAS
Convincing a panel of established Barristers to hire you requires preparation, so I signed up for a mock interview with City’s Pupillage Advice Service. As instructed, I arrived dressed for court – I was terrified! The questions came thick and fast: “What do you think of the concept of merit?”; “Which historical figure would you like to be featured in an exhibition in a London museum?”; What are you most proud of having achieved in your life?
This stage is about showing the interview panel who you are and why you would be a good fit, so it’s crucial to research the Chambers and their selection criteria. The mock interview made me think about the image I wanted to convey to people who would be meeting me for the first time. In my feedback, I was told that I had not smiled and needed to engage more with the panel. Food for thought.
I attended many of the lectures organised by the Pupillage Advice Service including the Path to Pupillage talk from Georgina Woolfe and Alexander Robson which was highly informative on everything from how to fill in the Gateway Form to what to wear.
Preparing for Exercises in Interview – Group Advocacy Exercise – Propositions and Fact Management
The Pupillage Advice Service offer a three hour long Interview Exercise workshop. There was no preparation for the exercise. We were told that at some stage during the interview you are likely to be presented with a proposition. When we got the the workshop we were given a mock advocacy exercise. For example, ‘Should trial by Jury be abandoned.’ We were picked at random, one by one, to argue our point. Those who thought they had been let off the hook were then selected to cross examine the first speaker on the arguments they’d just made. It meant we had to stay alert at all times and think on our feet. We learnt quickly that there’s unlikely to be an easy answer but there will be an expectation that you stand your ground and back up your point with reasoned arguments and evidence.I also learnt that in an interview be ready for anything. We then had a fact management and analysis exercise when we were asked to work as a team and I had to try and persuade the team of my clients point of view. All these exercises had been used in Chambers in the past and this three hour session was an eye opener on what could be expected.
Pupillage Interview Day
At the beginning of the Interview season City Law School holds a Pupillage Interview Day. This was particularly helpful for me because I already had an interview that evening. This was a day of workshops, lectures and mock interviews that was focused specifically on how to tackle the Pupillage Interviews. You can see some of the types of events featured via this selection of blogposts. There were also bookable mock interviews with or without Advocacy exercises and the three hour workshop that I explained above.
On this day I attended the lecture on Ethics the golden rules – Answering the Ethical questions in Interview.
We were told that this is a topic that is highly likely to come up in any pupillage interview. We could be asked a question about the ‘principle’ of something – for example, the ‘Cab Rank Rule’ – or we could be given a set of facts and asked to discuss whether we believed any ethical issues arose. To tackle either, we were advised to ‘contextualise’ the situation and demonstrate that we were aware of a wide range of angles. Rob discussed two scenarios with us. The first was what to do in the situation where we were a criminal barrister and were told we would receive the same fee for our client whether they pleaded guilty or not guilty. This led to a lively debate amongst the students as those of us interested in practising at the criminal Bar are fully aware of the Government’s current proposals to pay one fee whatever the plea or outcome of the case. My own reading of the Code of Conduct explicitly says that your client’s interests come first and that if your client has a defence then you must advise that client to plead ‘not guilty’.
This is a perhaps the most important ability skill a Barrister requires and one which you are required to display throughout the interview. However, you may also be asked about the processes involved when representing a client in court. The preparatory Criminal Advocacy Session began with how to make a decent bail application. The fundamental question to consider was whether there was a “substantial risk” of interference with a witness, failing to surrender or committing another offence. We learnt that structure in a bail application was crucial because you need to let the court know where you were going and why.
At the end of the day, I put on my new black suit and heels (I almost never wear heels) and trotted off to my first pupillage interview at a well-known criminal focused Chambers around the corner.
What were the exercises? To argue a proposition and to make a bail application.
Miranda Grell is studying the P/T BPTC at The City Law School, City University London. After the Interview season Miranda was offered and accepted a pupillage at a well-known criminal and human rights’ chambers.